[pci-cat-slider slidestoshow="4" exclude_cat="4" show_count="false"]
Inside data centre thumbnail.

Remote Hands vs. On-Site Staff: Making the Right Choice for Your Data Center

Inside data centre.

Remote Hands vs. On-Site Staff - Making the Right Choice for Your Data Centre

When it comes to managing your data centre operations, one of the most crucial decisions is choosing between remote hands services and dedicated on-site staff. This choice can significantly impact your operational efficiency, costs, and overall service quality. Let’s dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you make an informed decision.

Understanding the Basics

Remote hands services provide on-demand technical support through local technicians who can respond to your requirements without being permanent employees. On the other hand, on-site staff consists of dedicated team members who work exclusively at your facility. Each model has its distinct advantages and limitations.

Cost Considerations

The financial implications of these options vary significantly. Remote hands services typically operate on a pay-as-you-go model, with costs ranging from £100 to £500 per hour, depending on the location and service level. You only pay for the time used, making it cost-effective for facilities with intermittent needs.

 

On-site staff, however, requires a substantial fixed investment. A single skilled technician’s annual salary can range from £60,000 to £100,000, plus benefits, training, and overhead costs. For 24/7 coverage, you’ll need multiple shifts, potentially tripling these costs. However, this investment might be justified for larger operations with constant maintenance requirements.

Response Time Analysis

Response time is a critical factor in data centre operations. On-site staff provides immediate response to issues, typically within minutes of detection. This instant availability can be crucial during emergencies or when immediate physical intervention is required.


Remote hands services usually guarantee response times between 30 minutes to 4 hours, depending on your service level agreement (SLA). While this might be acceptable for routine tasks, it could be problematic during critical situations where every minute of downtime counts.

Capability Comparison

On-site staff typically develops deep familiarity with your specific infrastructure and procedures. This institutional knowledge can be invaluable for complex troubleshooting and maintenance tasks. They can also handle preventive maintenance more effectively and spot potential issues before they become problems.

 

Remote hands services often provide access to a broader range of specialized skills, as they can deploy different technicians based on the specific task requirements. However, these technicians might need more time to understand your unique setup and may require detailed instructions for each task.

Making the Right Choice

The optimal choice depends on several factors specific to your operation:

 

Consider on-site staff if:

 

– Your facility requires frequent physical interventions
– You have stringent security requirements
– Your operations demand immediate response times
– You have a large, complex infrastructure requiring consistent attention

 

Remote hands might be more suitable if:

 

– You operate a smaller facility
– Your maintenance needs are irregular
– You’re looking to minimize fixed costs
– You need occasional access to specialized skills

 

Many organizations opt for a hybrid approach, maintaining a small on-site team for critical operations while using remote hands services for after-hours support or specialized tasks. This combination can provide the best of both worlds while optimizing costs and maintaining service quality.

 

Remember that this decision isn’t permanent – as your data centre grows and evolves, you can adjust your support strategy to match your changing needs.

Online Gaming Giant – Yorkshire to Gilbratar Move

Gibraltar move header image.

Online Gaming Giant - Yorkshire to Gilbratar Move

1. Gibraltar, as well as Cyprus, Malta and Sweden are popular hosting destinations for the worlds leading online gaming and sports betting companies. DataMove has worked on behalf of the biggest sports-betting companies globally in all of these locations.

 

2. DataMove were asked to move £250,000 worth of vital processing servers and associated equipment from two sites – Harrogate and Newport in the UK – to GibTel in Gibraltar – the British Overseas Territory.

 

Being high value and not to mention data sensitive equipment, the client required a dedicated van service – door to door and full rack, stack and patch both ends.

 

3. Project Manager Alex established a clear plan and immediately lodged an import record for the manifested goods with HM Customs Gibraltar with our preferred partner on the ground in Gib.

 

Prepayment of import taxes is important so as not to delay shipments into Gibraltar. Alex assigned two engineers and one of our euro spec Sprinters to carry out the work door to door in four days.

 

T1 documents were logged with HMRC and all paperwork’s were in place. This was a bit easier before Brexit but nonetheless standard for us now – we carry out cross border shipments weekly. Before or after Brexit, entry into Gibraltar has always been entertaining.

 

4. The Team carried out a full audit and port map at point of de-rack as these devices would have different elevations at the destination site. Between the two sites, there were 28 HP DL360 G10 devices and a handful of networking devices also being transported to the destination.

 

After a night stop at a secure compound near Folkestone, the team collected documentation near Ashford and boarded the tunnel for France. Gibraltar is a two to three day drive.

 

A few days later… cleared customs at La Línea de la Concepción and into Gibraltar. A relatively simple rack and stack and final ports map followed by a couple of hours remote troubleshooting to ensure our client was fully online and all devices visible.

 

5. Our skilled engineers ensured that this fast paced high security job was carried out in a timely and professional fashion.

 

Data Centres aren’t exactly glamorous but it can be nice to swing by the sunny climes of Gibraltar and Spain once in a while !

 

After the job was completed, this client usually has our engineers on standby for 24 hours or one full working day in case any problems arise or they require any further patching and this time it was no different.

 

Once this was completed, our team were back on the road and even took in a bit of sightseeing on the way back – admiring the beautiful Norman Foster creation – the Millau Bridge. What a sight to behold!

 

For more information about our cross border data centre relocations, contact us today!

Servers in Gibraltar
Gibraltar data centre building.
Gibraltar data centre building
Broken servers in data centre thumbnail.

5 Hidden Costs of DIY Data Centre Migration

Broken servers in data centre.

5 Hidden Costs of DIY Data Centre Migration

Continuing from our previous blog post about the hidden costs of DIY data center migrations, we’ll explore additional challenges associated with these self-managed projects.

 

Data centre migration can seem like an attractive DIY project for organizations looking to cut costs. However, many companies discover significant hidden expenses that can quickly erode anticipated savings. Here are five often-overlooked costs that can impact your migration budget.


1. Extended Parallel Operations


While organizations typically budget for running parallel systems during migration, they frequently underestimate the duration. What starts as a planned one-month parallel operation often extends to three or more months due to unexpected compatibility issues or performance problems. This extension means paying for power, cooling, and maintenance at both locations for longer than anticipated, sometimes doubling or tripling the original infrastructure costs.


2. Staff Overtime and Productivity Loss

DIY migrations often rely heavily on existing IT staff to handle the transition alongside their regular duties. This approach can lead to substantial overtime costs and decreased productivity in other areas. Teams frequently work nights and weekends to minimize disruption to business operations, resulting in premium pay rates and potential burnout. Moreover, regular maintenance tasks and project work may fall behind, creating technical debt that must be addressed later.


3. Emergency Technical Support


When critical issues arise during migration, organizations often need to engage vendors or consultants for emergency support at premium rates. Without the comprehensive planning that professional migration services provide, companies frequently encounter compatibility issues, network problems, or hardware failures that require immediate expert intervention. These last-minute support calls can cost three to five times more than standard service rates.


4. Data Transfer and Bandwidth Charges


Organizations often overlook the significant costs associated with data transfer, especially when moving between regions or cloud providers. Large-scale data migrations can incur substantial bandwidth charges, and the need for multiple data synchronization passes can multiply these costs. Additionally, organizations may need to invest in temporary dedicated connection services to maintain acceptable transfer speeds and reliability.


5. Business Impact Costs


Perhaps the most significant hidden cost comes from underestimating the business impact of migration-related disruptions. Even minor service interruptions can lead to lost revenue, decreased customer satisfaction, and reduced employee productivity. Organizations often fail to account for the cost of delayed projects, missed deadlines, and potential customer compensation due to service-level agreement violations during the migration period.


By understanding these hidden costs, organizations can better evaluate whether a DIY approach truly offers cost savings over professional migration services. Proper planning and budgeting for these potential expenses can help prevent unwelcome surprises and ensure a more successful data centre migration.